Comments: Though the Thermopac capacity and quantity of steam
generated are very small, the payback period is very attractive. The same logic
can be extrapolated to any size of Waste Heat Recovery system. |
STEAM DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:
The steam distribution system comprises of the following
components:
1. Moisture separator
2. Pressure reducing station
3. Piping and its insulation
4. Steam traps
All of the above distribution system components contribute largely to efficient
plant operations. The effect of individual component on the overall efficiency
is very hard to determine.
Following are some of the hard facts regarding steam losses in various
components of Steam Distribution system.
Leakage: |
| Steam Pressure |
Steam kg/year |
FO kg/year |
Rs./Year |
| Hole Dia of 1/10 Inch |
| 7 kg/cm2) |
50,880 |
4,070.4 |
42,780 |
| 21 kg/cm2 |
1,20,000 |
9,600 |
1,00,896 |
| Hole Dia of 1/8 Inch |
| 7 kg/cm2) |
2,03,636 |
16,291 |
1,71,217 |
| 21 kg/cm2 |
4,80,000 |
38,400 |
4,03,584 |
| Hole Dia of 3/16 Inch |
| 7 kg/cm2) |
4,58,182 |
36,655 |
3,85,244 |
| 21 kg/cm2 |
10,80,000 |
86,400 |
6,84,874 |
| Hole Dia of 1/4 Inch |
| 7 kg/cm2) |
8,14,545 |
65,164 |
9,08,064 |
| 21 kg/cm2 |
19,20,000 |
1,53,600 |
16,14,336 |
|
| Basis : |
F. O. Price |
= |
Rs. 10.5 per kg |
| - |
Operating hrs |
= |
8,000 hrs per year |
| - |
Steam Ratio |
= |
12.5 kg of steam per kg FO |
|
Loss Due To Improper Insulation :
| Steam
Temp. |
Rs./M2/Year |
| >
°C |
Lagging
Thickness |
| |
Bare |
1
Inch |
½
Inch |
2
Inch |
2
½ Inch |
3
Inch |
4
Inch |
| 38 |
1590 |
265 |
185 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| 65 |
4100 |
662 |
529 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| 93 |
7810 |
1191 |
794 |
662 |
- |
- |
- |
| 121 |
11910 |
1720 |
1191 |
926 |
- |
- |
- |
| 149 |
17070 |
2249 |
1588 |
1191 |
1058 |
- |
- |
| 177 |
23150 |
2778 |
1984 |
1588 |
1191 |
- |
- |
| 204 |
30160 |
3308 |
2381 |
1852 |
1455 |
1191 |
- |
| 232 |
38390 |
3969 |
2778 |
2117 |
1720 |
1455 |
- |
| 260 |
47890 |
4631 |
3307 |
2514 |
1984 |
1720 |
- |
| 316 |
70650 |
- |
4234 |
3175 |
2646 |
2249 |
1720 |
| 371 |
99220 |
- |
- |
3969 |
3307 |
2778 |
2117 |
| 427 |
34950 |
- |
- |
4895 |
3969 |
3441 |
2646 |
|
| Relation of steam velocities and pressure drop in the pipe : |
| Pipe
Size |
Steam
Pressure kg/cm2 |
Velocity M/Sec with
pressure drop/25 Meters |
| |
|
0.0175 |
0.035 |
0.0525 |
0.07 |
0.105 |
0.14 |
0.21 |
| 3
Inch Pipe |
0.338 |
41 |
55 |
72 |
82 |
100 |
120 |
152 |
| 3
Inch Pipe |
1.013 |
26 |
37 |
44 |
52 |
63 |
76 |
96 |
| 3
Inch Pipe |
1.75 |
15 |
23 |
26 |
32 |
40 |
46 |
58 |
| 3
Inch Pipe |
7 |
9 |
14 |
17 |
20 |
23 |
27 |
35 |
| 3
Inch Pipe |
28 |
- |
- |
9 |
11 |
12 |
15 |
18 |
| 6
Inch Pipe |
0.338 |
67 |
96 |
122 |
140 |
168 |
191 |
229 |
| 6
Inch Pipe |
1.013 |
4.4 |
58 |
73 |
91 |
107 |
123 |
152 |
| 6
Inch Pipe |
175 |
24 |
35 |
44 |
52 |
61 |
73 |
91 |
| 6
Inch Pipe |
7 |
15 |
21 |
27 |
32 |
40 |
46 |
55 |
| 6
Inch Pipe |
28 |
- |
9 |
14 |
17 |
20 |
23 |
29 |
|
| How
to read the above table : Example: For 6” pipe, at 7
kg/cm2 pressure the pressure drop in the
pipe shall be : |
| 0.0175 kg/cm2 per 25 meters of running length |
: |
if velocity is 15 m/s |
| 0.0525 kg/cm2 per 25 meters of running length |
: |
if velocity is 27 m/s |
| 0.21 kg/cm2 per 25 meters of running length |
: |
if velocity is 55 m/s |
|
Case Study to elaborate the effect of insulation of flanges:
100
ft of 6 Inch pipe 12 Flanges of 6 Inch = 5 ft of pipe length Heat loss
in
following 3 cases :
Case (I) – Bare pipe ( Bare Flanges)
Case (II) – Pipe with 2 inch insulation aluminum cladding and bare
flanges
Case (III) – Insulated pipe and Flanges |
| |
|
Case
(I) |
Case
(II) |
Case
(III) |
Heat
Loss |
Kcal/year |
36,300 |
4,100 |
2,490 |
Steam
Loss |
Kg/Year/100ft |
68 |
3.2 |
– |
Fuel
Loss |
Kg/Year/100ft |
55 |
0.26 |
– |
Energy
Saving Potential |
Rs.
Per Year/100 ft |
60 |
2.8 |
– |
|
| Present Scenario :- |
| Boiler Capacity |
: |
850 kg/hr (non-IBR) |
| Fuel consumption
(LDO) |
: |
50 liters per hour (900 liters per day) |
| Boiler operating hours |
: |
18 per day |
| Plants to which boiler is attached |
: |
Reactor and dryers both indirect heating applications |
|
| No moisture separator installed in the line and only TD traps for drain
points After the Moisture separator was installed in the pipeline : |
| Fuel consumption |
: |
45 liters per hour (630 liters per day) |
| Boiler operating hours |
: |
14 per day |
|
| Energy Conservation
Potential : |
| Daily fuel saving |
: |
270 liters |
| Annual reduction in fuel bill |
: |
Rs. 10 Lacs |
| Investment Required |
: |
Rs. 4,500/- |
|
Additionally the production capacity increased due to availability
of the
production equipment for longer durations.
STEAM UTILIZATION SYSTEM : This area is most potent for energy
conservation. The application, end use utility and quality of steam are the
three main points that govern energy performance of the system. Energy
performance of the system can be drastically improved by close examination of
the system. The energy saving is affected by following measures:
Reducing the demand of steam by modification of application system by:
-
Reduction in operating hours
-
Reduction in quantity required per hour
-
Use of more efficient technology
-
Minimizing wastage
We shall elaborate the efficiency enhancement process by suitable
examples of
each type. |
|
|
|